![]() I have a lot of reasons why I’m against this resolution. My duty is not to my own ideology, what I’d like to see happen. “And I don’t want to see any harm come to the University of North Carolina from any kind of resolution, particularly this one. “My duty on this board, my fiduciary duty, is to the University of North Carolina,” Meekins said. Whatever members might think of such a resolution philosophically or politically, Meekins said, they needed to consider potential legal repercussions. And I think every member of this board, before you vote on this resolution, needs to know number one, if there are any legal implications and if there are, what they are, and how it may affect the University.” UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees Member Ralph Meekins. But I can’t disclose what the opinion is. “I don’t know what the opinion of our lawyers is on this. And if you talk to any lawyer, they’ll tell you the same,” Meekins, who is an attorney, said. “I know for a fact…that this resolution goes well beyond the Supreme Court ruling. “If the University considers the personal experience of applicants for admission, each applicant must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual – not on the basis of race.”Īt least one board member, Ralph Meekins, warned against passage of the resolution before consulting carefully with university counsel. The university “shall not establish through application essays or other means” any proxies “premised upon race-based preferences in hiring or admissions,” the resolution reads. The new policy language passed in a resolution by the board of trustees Thursday would make it nearly impossible to craft questions - or consider answers - about racial experiences or how race has affected an applicant’s life. But it also explicitly stated “nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise.”Ĭonservative critics have seized on that line, warning colleges and universities could ask such questions as a proxy for race. The high court’s ruling found using race as a criterion in admissions decisions to be a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause. Supreme Court decision against considering race in admissions. The UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees passed changes to the university’s non-discrimination policy Thursday that some members warned go well beyond last month’s U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |